Intelligence²: The threat posed by Iran has been grossly exaggerated
Their session on April 25th was on the following statement:
The threat posed by Iran has been grossly exaggerated
Speaking for the motion: Iradj Bagherzade, Dr Ali Ansari, and Martin Woollacott.
Speaking against the motion: Dr Mehrdad Khonsari, Dr Patrick Clawson, and Roey Gilad.
Chair: Richard Lindley.
BBC-Persian has a detailed coverage here.
About 700 people attended the session and cast their votes before and after the debate:
Before the debate, 268 of the attendees believed that "Iran is an imminent threat"
253 of them thought that the threat is exaggerated, and 214 (about 30%) of them were not sure.
After the debate, two third of those undecided chose their stance and guess what:
The threat posed by Iran has been grossly exaggerated | ||||
Date | April 25, 2006 | |||
Votes | Before debate | After debate | ||
For | 34.4% | 51.1% | ||
Against | 36.5% | 38.7% | ||
Don't know | 29.1% | 10.2% |
"... The IAEA report shows that iran has accelarated its efforts to aquire nuclear weopons ..."
Apparantly, IAEA still has no evidence of existence of such nuclear weopons program.